What if a criminal -murderer and a pedofile makes up a religion and gets followers,

Who's doing the slaughtering the pope? or priests?

But the queen beats everything dude! even three super bowl rings!!!

Second thought - give us the 2 super bowls and you can have her!

 

Jesus showed loved to those who crucified him at the cross he said: "Luke 23:34[But Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they don't know what they are doing.”]

You can kill somebody, but not his soul. So killing won't change that soul for the better.
That is why God gave a command "You shall not kill."
Everyone is sent on earth to acquire something for his soul to enrich it, and to get wisdom and love.
Love of everybody is what the true Divine Wisdom is all about. If people applied that, we wouldn't have all these violence related problems around the world.

THE HARDEST DIVINE IDEA THOUGH IS TO LOVE YOUR ENEMIES. If you want to check out how great is your strength try to love your enemies. Jesus did it, and that's what every Christian is expected to do.

 

Quite literally! LOVE YOUR ENEMIES!

He must of had a hard time shagging the devil out of her:

Christian priest has sex with disabled daughter to get the devil out of her.

 

I hope homosexuals band together and make their own religion (again some dumbass will write down what he hears from a burning bush), except this time god tells them to put to death those who lie down with any of the opposite sex.

There we go, now you can all kill each other over your intolerance of each other while I sit back and laugh.

 

I didn't think you were talking about me, I knew you meant Stox - but your response was worded in a weird way and didn't make sense. (Go back and look.) Is English your first language?

Nehemiah - you thinking gays should be killed really means you have no right to complain when people want Muslims killed, right?

One day I'll be supreme leader of the universe, then anyone who loves anyone else can f*ck, marry, have kids - whatever - all in peace. No Muslims though, they'd be throwing stones left, right and center.

We'd ask them, "Please, stop throwing stones."
They would scream, "ALLAH IS GREAT!" before throwing another pebble at an imaginary "sinner".

We'd laugh, but really, they'd have to go

 

In short:

Obamanation posted and implied the "gayness", you said basically "who would say things like that? and why would it matter?" I said because he's a republican (very right-wing at at that), hence that's why it would bother him (It was also a joke actually, kind of).

I didn't imply anything about you nor St0x. I believe if St0x thought I did he would have responded. Are you sure that you was not just missing the fact that I was talking about Obamanation?

 

Read something about Jesus and you'll find no crimes committed by Him by any civilized standards. This "priest" is nothing less than a criminal. This kind of behavior is punishable by law in the civilized world (the so called "priest" is in jail now), unlike Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan and etc. muslim countries where pedophilia is not uncommon and is not punishable by law. The pedofiles in the respective countries are protected by sharia law.
Do you see or you can't the HUGE difference how pedofilia is addressed in the two completely different worlds of Christianity and Islam?

 

I see a strawman and someone telling me to believe in a certain god, how many gods are there (not in your head), in terms of different gods for different religions?

What makes the people that believe in other gods more delusional than you? wasn't your Jesus punished by law? isn't that a criminal?

But nevertheless a priest a Christian, are you doing the Muslim thing (as you claim): "oh he's not really Christian"?

He wanted to make love to his daughter to get the devil out of her, he was doing a godly duty. Read things "in-context" for god sake.

 

So, let me get this straight.

Nemamama wants to kill the gays.

Truth747 points out "Thou shalt not kill".

Namamamiyeha ignores it.

Truth747 ignores that he ignores it.


Wow. Here I was thinking there would be an argument between one who says from one of the Commandments "Thou shalt not kill" while the other just goes off saying that "All Homosexuals should die".

Again.

Wow.

Really you guys...

Really.

You are ridiculous to the point of making my sides hurt from laughing. I feel faint. I am laughing this up in such a way that I see spots.

If there ever was a reason to reject religion... this is a prime example.

ROTFLOL does not express the kind of glee that I am attempting to type through.

You have made fools and mockeries of your religions... and it is delicious. I thrive on your clumsiness. I soak it up and laugh it out. With this much laughing I will live forever!

Just...


Wow

 

Religion is just a way to twist facts in general and justifying killing, justifying being better than the unbelievers and living in the clouds after you die for eternity (when they don't even grasp what that means)

Also they can kill (x) and there right to do so (the book), but (x) can't kill them because there protected by "thou shalt not kill" (the book).

Then people say "oh so you or your religion advocates death and killing of (x, y, z)?"

"No we don't kill", "we don't advocate it, nor the our holy book" - "were all nice and god and Jesus are just so clean and right, so caring - here's a quote"

"The winds shall bring down the wrath of whatever blah blah blah on whoever, and the one that stands in the light shall be the righteous" (you get the idea total bs)

"But at the end of the day it advocates death, right?"

No your reading it "out of context", you need god

 

Nehemiah, for the purposes of this thread, I am gay and have anal sex. What exactly are you or anyone else gonna do/should do about it? Are you going to risk getting your @ss beat/shot trying to kill me for your mythical god? Also, respond to Jackuul's 'Thou shalt not kill' you oaf.

 

He may be white, but I still see him as a gay Erkle. I believe in England, I've got a 50/50 chance he is not white. Hes definitely not over 21, that seems nearly certain. Regarding my comments being distasteful, what could be distasteful about them? You don't like homosexuals, or just competition ? If you find nothing wrong with homosexuality, you'll see my comments are no more offensive than yours.

@toopac Right wing Republican? Please. As you can tell by my posts I am a rabid Obama/Zibblu supporting, left leaning, welfare taking, non-working , living in San Francisco, Michael Moore liberal who throws out gay pickup lines at guys like Stox.

Perhaps your poor understanding of US politics has you believing that it is the Republican party that supports Israel over Palestine, and thus you have marked me as a Republican. Trust me when i say the Democrats don't like Palestine over Israel any more than the Republicans do.

@Stox - outside London Liverpool street station 7:00 Friday night - See you there big boy.

 

I think it is offensive to imply someone is gay in order to insult them, which I believe was what you were doing. I could be wrong but it seems almost certain in the context it was used. ^-^;

 

Your whole persona is to try to appear to be a liberal, whilst posting stereotypes of liberals/liberal ideas (like a racist may stereotype all blacks are minstrels), whilst deep down you're republican. Zibblu hit the nail on the head, you're a false flag

 

If you are not against homosexuality/gays , then why do you think that labeling some one gay is insult?

 

You misread me, polite. I think that using the word gay as an insult (as in using to try and insult someone) is offensive.

Fuck - how hard is that to understand? /facepalm

 

It's interesting that you think gays should be killed yet, as you are free to post on the internet (though i don't of the restrictions placed on internet use by various institutions), don't seem to have followed this advice, advice you supposedly think is from god. it seems even the must fundi-mentals regect the so-called "word of god" in favour of things they inherently know to be right.

Thats one repulsive veiw i have forced to you profess. Now on to the second.

Do you think disobedient sons should be stoned to death and hung from a tree?

 

You are. If my invitation was disingenuous, it was certainly not meant as an insult. I often put sexual fantasies about Barrack Hussein Obama, and three ways with Madeline Albright and Nancy Pelosi to print, also not meant as insults. It's called humorous(at least I find it humorous) chiding. It does sound like you may be either homophobic or a at least a bit overly sensitive to the politically incorrect. I'm not trying to insult you, just making an observation.

If you are interested in what an insult looks like, here are a few, just from this thread:

Late 20s early 30s? I think not.

 

The fragile little perpetual victims see any criticisms, especially accurate ones, as insults.