Tools for checking the uniqueness of the text

Hi

Tell us about your personal experience of using the tools and which ones you use. Personally, I previously used several different sites to check the written articles for uniqueness, of course I wrote them myself and therefore the uniqueness was always above 95%, but sometimes even my thoughts were similar to the thoughts of other people and therefore I got 80% uniqueness although I wrote the text myself. In general, I would like to know your personal experience and what exactly do you use to check the text?

 

I've had a similar experience with checking article uniqueness. I’ve tried various tools like Copyscape and Grammarly, and while my original work often scores high in uniqueness, I’ve noticed that common phrases or ideas can sometimes bring that down. It’s a bit frustrating, but it’s also a reminder of how interconnected our thoughts can be.

 

We are all the same

 

Hi! I usually use a few tools, like the previous commenters, such as Copyscape or Grammarly, to check for uniqueness. Sometimes, even if I write the text myself, there can be similarities due to common phrases or topics, so the result may not be 100%.

 

I like Quetext, which offers detailed plagiarism reports. Free option could be tool like SmallSEOTools. Grammarly is good idea too.

 

I ran into this problem when I first started writing articles. I thought I was writing something unique, but then it turned out that there was only 90 percent uniqueness in my thoughts. HOW DO WE ALL THINK THE SAME WAY

However, it's funny that it's enough to delete two or three sentences and you will have 100 percent uniqueness of the text.

 

I will definitely try, thanks for the advice.

 

Guys, thank you all for the answers, it's really useful in my work, and not only for me, but also for everyone who sees this post and is going to work in the field where I have to write articles. You are the best for sharing such information.

 

Quillbot is also an option. But I use it mostly to check for AI in content I get from someone else.

 

There are plenty of tools out there to check if your text is unique. The most popular ones are plagiarism checkers like Grammarly, Copyscape, and Quetext. Some of them are free with limits, while others require a subscription for deep checks. If you're working with academic content, Turnitin is a common choice. For SEO purposes, you might want to try Small SEO Tools or Plagscan. Just copy and paste your text, and the tool will compare it against millions of sources online. Easy and useful!

 

Here’s an example of a comment in English for the thread about tools for checking the uniqueness of text on Digital Point: -Comment: Hi everyone! This is a really helpful topic. I’ve used a few tools for checking text uniqueness, and here are some that I’ve found useful: 1. Copyscape – It’s great for checking if content has been copied from other websites. It’s one of the most trusted plagiarism checkers out there.

 

i think turnitin is goood

 

Paid tools like Turnitin and Grammarly Premium are the real deal if you're looking for top-notch accuracy and serious features, especially for academic or professional work. They have massive databases and advanced functions that give you peace of mind. On the flip side, free tools like SmallSEOTools and Duplichecker are solid for a quick check, but they don't quite stack up in terms of database size and fancy features. If you're diving into SEO content, Copyscape is pretty much the go-to for making sure your stuff stands out as original across the web. Bottom line, mixing and matching these tools is a smart move—it’ll help you catch any mistakes you might’ve missed and give you a solid read on your content’s originality.

 

Personally, I’ve used a few different tools to check my articles for plagiarism or uniqueness. One I’ve used a lot is Copyscape. It’s been a go-to for checking if any part of my text matches anything else online. I’ve always felt like it gives a solid result, though I do notice that sometimes it flags things that are more about general phrasing than actual copying.

I’ve also used Grammarly's plagiarism checker when I’m already using it for grammar and style. It’s pretty convenient, but I wouldn’t say it’s as thorough as some of the more dedicated plagiarism tools.

Another tool I’ve tried is Quetext, which I like for its user-friendly interface and pretty accurate reporting, especially in the Pro version. It’s not as well-known as Copyscape, but I’ve had good results with it when I’m trying to find matches across the web.

More recently, I’ve been experimenting with Turnitin (I know, it’s mainly for academic stuff, but it works well for checking any type of writing). It’s definitely on the pricier side, but I think it’s one of the most detailed tools I’ve used.

If I’m just checking something small or quick, I sometimes turn to Small SEO Tools or Plagscan. They’re free and good for a general check, but I wouldn’t rely on them for anything too crucial, especially for longer or more in-depth pieces.

But honestly, I’ve come to realize that sometimes no matter how much I check with these tools, certain topics or common phrases will still make my work appear similar to others. I just try to focus on giving my own take on the subject or rewording things to make it sound more personal. The tools help, but they’re not foolproof!

So yeah, that’s my experience with checking for uniqueness, and I think it’s a mix of using the right tools and making sure your writing stands out with your own voice. Hope that helps!

 

I completely agree that this is far from a 100% fact that you are not similar to someone else, and this is precisely because of certain phrases. I remember that I wrote a text somewhere between 8000 and 10,000 characters long and it was only 60% unique, and when I deleted or changed some phrases, the uniqueness increased to 95 percent. And the funny thing is that I followed the links and studied those articles and they didn't look like mine at all, but individual words spoil all the uniqueness! It's just terrible, but we live in such a reality, and here we can only figure out how to circumvent such restrictions.