Agree or not, You were told.

Do you know what happens when you don't seek out information, and instead rely only on what's handed to you through a media outlet?

You don't get the full picture, which is fine if it "doesn't concern you", but in this case it does.

In the event that you, the reader, are not up to snuff on your neuroscience, I will make what I have to say as easy to understand as possible.

Mind control is here, and it's as simple as "shocking" certain areas of the brain to produce different effects. (this information is widely available on the net, though it's never headlined). The latest micro-electrodes are impossible to detect.

In the U.S., there is an unidentified organization of individuals who are using/testing this technology on us citizens. (you can see live animals being controlled remotely, such as rats and insects on youtube).

From a scientific perspective, it's necessary to know the full range of this technology. It can be utilized to make someone depressed feel better (as seen in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation treatments), but could this technology drive a normal person to kill? It's very important to know, so how would you test that? Would you "wire" someone up without their knowledge and see if you could drive them to shoot up a movie theater or school as the result of a constant stimulation of their amygdala?

From a non-objective standpoint, would you deem 16 lives an "acceptable loss" when it comes to fine-tuning technology which will affect millions of people?

My answer to that question is "No". I will say though, that if you think you're living in a world in which people who would say "Yes" don't exist, then I would advise you to read a history book.

If you think that "you're a nobody" and therefore this doesn't affect you, I would ask you why most lab experiments are performed on mice and not endangered species? You've got to protect yourselves, and knowledge is power.

Stay informed.

 

Sounds like a good plug for "The Twilight Zone".