Dr. Phil and Digital Point..

No. The reason they elected a Pope from Germany is because he's about 104 and isn't expected to live long enough to do any real damage. Plus, having someone who was in the Hitler Youth (not his fault, of course, since it was compulsory for all children in Nazi Germany to belong to the HY) balances the previous pope's apology to the Jews for abandoning them in WW2. The Vatican, mindful of the fact that they are becoming increasingly irrelevant, is trying to figure out a way to not offend anybody, which means, of course, that they will end up pleasing nobody.

Rather like most western political parties these days...

 

It was done so power could be consolidated in Europe Minstrel, that is for sure, if Germany can be drawn in along with Spain it gives them more power to unite Europe into a sound entity.

Since they are losing power in South America to the evangelicals from the USA Europe is becoming more important to them.

 

Europe was always important to them, AC.... that's where most of their vast fortune came from...

 

This BUD's for you GTech

http://home.att.net/~mwhodges/debt.htm

I hope your kids have enough to pay their bills or those cardboard boxes will come in handy that you are saving, they are good for starting fires also GTech.

You will need them after the depression starts

PS: Republican economics 101 dude = steal all the money then get a government bail out (chapter 11)

 

Liberal points of view = never any substance to back them up.

Resorting to AT&T personal home pages for your source of news? How does that work for you?

Heh

 

Yeah, if it came from the RNC it would all be good information

Isn't that right GTech

 

I wouldn't know. I don't use the RNC to counter the absurdities you post. But I'm smart enough to know that just because you enter a search string of: hillary clinton has large testicles
and results come back, doesn't mean it's necessarily true

How does that work for you?

 

GTech, you do not engage in facts, but make an attempt to work propaganda and I have told you that folks are not going to be swayed by that.

Now address the national debt that I left you the "BUD LINK" on BUD, will you avoid this as you do always when backed in your corner again

 

You would like me to critique someone's personal home page? Is that how you really get your "facts?" Geez, no wonder...

Backed in a corner? Are talking about the UN now? That's the first thing that comes to mind with "backed in a corner."

 

Yeah folks, that is just like GTech, find some minor flaw in where the information is hosted (the guy did some great research and self published it), but at the same time he condemns the liberal mass media sources also

The "Republican Propaganda Network" (Fox News) is good though.

Right GTech

 

I'm sure it's difficult for you to find any solid information to back up your positions. Which leaves you with pre-defined search strings and personal home pages. No wonder you don't have a clue!

I'm duly impressed

Isn't it about time for a "Cheney hit me upside my head with a haliburton briefcase" post? Or how about an oldie, but goodie "Bush stole my can of oil?"

 

...or we could just have you post your endless loop of the same old responses when you can't answer a question presented lest you destroy your positions

1.) The UN are the oil criminals (not Halliburton or Ken Lay/Enron)

2.) Dick Cheney is an honest business executive

3.) Nixon was not such a bad guy, Kissinger has been and is good for America

4.) The liberal news media is all under Bill and Hilary's control

5.) and the moonbat creations of GTech = moonbats and Bush stole my can of OIL

 

You can take 2,3,4 out of the options. If I don't have something to back it up, I usually don't support it. I have no idea what type of businessman Cheney was, but Clinton seemed to like him as he used Haliburton's services while Cheney ran the company. Didn't know Nixon well and never really cared about him or Kissinger much. But I do note that you often make mention of them, as if somehow I might be offended by their deeds in history. Comical, to say the least! Number 4 is way off the map. I would never give credit to Bill and Hillary for that.

We do, however, have plenty of incriminating evidence against the real oil thieves and it is well documented. But I realize you don't like to talk about your buds and that scandal. Funny though, we have absolutely nothing about Bush or Cheney stealing oil. So, put a blind fold on and walk past the real oil thieves and make up stories that it's someone else. How does that work?

 

Let me find a mediation between current discussion and topic of the title:

Is Dr. Phil a republican?

I think he is, who else has the same/a different opinion?

 

I've heard he is Republican.

I think Anthony is a closet Republican

 

Like I told you before GTech, you need to become a comic because you are funny as hell dude

 

Anthony, here is a question and before you answer, search your soul:

If you were to become a multi millionaire within the next few years, would you switch political convictions or not?

 

I can't take all the credit Anthony, look at what I have to work with!

 

Hell no, I love the people who work hard in this nation, they are the one's who worked all their lives and are being robbed by the criminals that we call Republicans, even your hero is going down the tubes in California.

Arnold is done dude, he should have never wasted time supporting Bush like that idiot Zell Miller did when he took Bush Seniors bribe to change parties and speak against John Kerry at the Republican convention along with that idiot Arnold.

 

Sounds like a scripted quote from a Bahgdad Bob doll when you pull the string!