1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

i heard 468x60 do not perform well

Discussion in 'Placement / Reviews / Examples' started by devin, Mar 6, 2006.

0
  1. #1
    i just put a new site up (still have many pages of content to put in). someone says that 468x60 screams "I'm an ad!!" and suffers from low CTR. can you guys share your experiences?
     
    devin, Mar 6, 2006 IP
  2. jackburton2006

    jackburton2006 Peon

    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    282
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Yeah, it really blows at converting. Instead of 468, use the adlink in the same area instead.
     
    jackburton2006, Mar 6, 2006 IP
  3. dcristo

    dcristo Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    19,776
    Likes Received:
    1,200
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    470
    Articles:
    7
    #3
    checkout google's adsense optimization tips on their own site.

    The best performers are the box shape ads, the 250x250 and the other wider ad unit.
     
    dcristo, Mar 6, 2006 IP
  4. sketch

    sketch Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    148
    #4
    Maybe it depends on the content or integration... over the past 30 days, my 468s rank 3rd in clicks and 2nd in CTR.

    Coincidentally, today my banners have a higher CTR and clicks than the other 2 ads I use (text links on right, 125x125 on left).

    Or maybe it's just luck :)
     
    sketch, Mar 6, 2006 IP
  5. devin

    devin Guest

    Messages:
    4,461
    Likes Received:
    449
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    :( i knew it. now i've to go change all the ads on my pages. or maybe i should let it up for a week?
     
    devin, Mar 6, 2006 IP