is Facebook able to drive more organic traffic than Twitter?

hi,
i do not there may be thread like it or not, but i want to know which is able to generate more organic traffic in my site? i know there are a lot of members in both social networking sites.currently Facebook is my focus. but i saw some people focusing on Twitter. so is Facebook able to generate more organic and unique visitors in my site?

 

i think this thread of mine still not reached to my fellow members. any reply on this topic please?

 

Depends on how responsive your followers are!
I prefer Facebook.....

 

you must use facebook ppc for the same

 

I focus mostly on Twitter and prefer it to Facebook.

 

On Twitter you can get visitors who may be looking for services as well. But on Facebook you should use it for getting more and more likes.

 

May be or not be. It's all depend on your networks...

 

I think facebook gives more organic traffic than twitter mostly because of the amount of facebook users. Although twitter can give such traffic only if you have more real followers

 

Twitter I believe it's more much easier to connect with. Not liking facebook groups at all. Has served me no purpose yet.

 

You may find different people showing different stats. Some of them would be favoring twitter, some of them may be facebook and other may favor stumbleupon/delicious etc depending upon their business nature and depending upon their influence on that particular network. These all social networks have potential to provide your with large number of unique visitors, but it only depends upon how do you plan your social media activities.

 

I gotta say I have been able to get some very high CTRs with Twitter (compared to other peoples twitter results)

 

To add to the discussion,

I find it easier to connect through twitter. You just have to worry about 140 characters.

My stats show twitter to be more effective than facebook.

But admittedly I am going to look at facebook again.

 

Twitter in comparison has gone in for drastic innovation in terms of how people talk to each other online. Twitter can be called as a partially geeky (with its @ symbols and formulaic syntax) yet highly entertaining and engaging medium. Updates on Twitter are immediate and sometimes highly enriching. The uniqueness of Twitter is its biggest USP. Facebook is cool. While some people are drawn to geeky things, more people are drawn to cool things. It's as simple as that. Twitter is more "geeky" because it's unique, whereas Facebook is much more "common", and then points out five reasons why Facebook marketing is far superior to marketing on Twitter.

 

It depends on the target audience you have in facebook and twitter wherever of the two if you build a write network that really wants your product then expect of more traffic.

 

why not, you can get more and more traffic from facebook if you know how you use this platform, you should join your business relevant groups then post there your site's links and then i think obviously you will get good traffic from facebook, however twitter have his own importance.

 

According to my personal experience I have got more traffic from facebook when compared to twitter.

 

Facebook or Twitter, if you are persistent in your work with these sites, they can be of great contribution for driving traffic.

 

In many sense facebook is much better and user friendly than twitter. But the basic concept of both social sites are different so both are on top in their category.

 

It really depends on the likes/followers ratio that your accounts and fan pages are having. If you have more followers, it should be easy. But it's the same for facebook in terms of likes so from an experienced point of view I'd say you go for both.

 

i think i now in a dilemma whether to go for facebook or twitter!!! my friends are just divided in facebook and twitter. so i am now facing problem to go with which one!! i have fashion business. both have good appeal in facebook and twitter too. so then where should i go now?