Static V Dynamic URL's in sigs

I notice the Google and Yahoo spiders viewing the No Permission tags in the user profile's on my forum. Is this a bad thing ?? having the No Permission I mean.

And to save another post is it a good idea to have the sig links static.
One of the members suggested this......
>>>After much updateing of my site I feel much better about spiders and their all powerfullness. My suggestion to this site is that you should at least use static URLs.<<<

His point was Dynamic URls drain the PR you would get if you used static pages. He went on to say googlebots hate dynamic pages (ones with question marks). So your whole site doesnt get indexed meaning you have a lower PR and worse SEO.

I don't believe this but just want to cover my bases .

 

Cyclops,
I'd go for static links every time, with one thing more. Use good keyphrase rich anchor text, then the bots will love you.

Ian

 

I've heard that hate dynamic pages becouse the dynamic pages can be easly create more and more every day..but static page you have to do it page by page

 

Besides, if the dynamic page url is too long then it just won't get followed.
Ian

 

You can mod_rewrite your dynamic URLs to convert them to static html pages.