The U.N.'s Internet Sneak Attack

Populace Well-Known Member

Messages:: 111

Likes Received:: 0

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 105

#1

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324352004578136902821852508.html

Who runs the Internet? For now, the answer remains no one, or at least no government, which explains the Web's success as a new technology. But as of next week, unless the U.S. gets serious, the answer could be the United Nations.

Many of the U.N.'s 193 member states oppose the open, uncontrolled nature of the Internet. Its interconnected global networks ignore national boundaries, making it hard for governments to censor or tax. And so, to send the freewheeling digital world back to the state control of the analog era, China, Russia, Iran and Arab countries are trying to hijack a U.N. agency that has nothing to do with the Internet.

For more than a year, these countries have lobbied an agency called the International Telecommunications Union to take over the rules and workings of the Internet. Created in 1865 as the International Telegraph Union, the ITU last drafted a treaty on communications in 1988, before the commercial Internet, when telecommunications meant voice telephone calls via national telephone monopolies.

Next week the ITU holds a negotiating conference in Dubai, and past months have brought many leaks of proposals for a new treaty. U.S. congressional resolutions and much of the commentary, including in this column, have focused on proposals by authoritarian governments to censor the Internet. Just as objectionable are proposals that ignore how the Internet works, threatening its smooth and open operations.

Having the Internet rewired by bureaucrats would be like handing a Stradivarius to a gorilla. The Internet is made up of 40,000 networks that interconnect among 425,000 global routes, cheaply and efficiently delivering messages and other digital content among more than two billion people around the world, with some 500,000 new users a day.
Click to expand...

Populace, Nov 26, 2012 IP

xuzhimol Greenhorn

Messages:: 70

Likes Received:: 0

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 6

#2

Confused!! the artical in business thread was suitable?

xuzhimol, Nov 26, 2012 IP

frednjkin Active Member

Messages:: 161

Likes Received:: 1

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 55

#3

Very informative....however as xuzhimol rightly points out....business section might be the right place for posting this information

frednjkin, Nov 26, 2012 IP

Populace Well-Known Member

Messages:: 111

Likes Received:: 0

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 105

#4

Sorry, the last thread was moved here. So I posted this one here. I guess because this could affect all of our businesses its suitable.

Populace, Dec 4, 2012 IP

Log in or Sign up

Advertising (learn more)

The U.N.'s Internet Sneak Attack

Populace Well-Known Member

xuzhimol Greenhorn

frednjkin Active Member

Populace Well-Known Member

Log in or Sign up

Advertising (learn more)

The U.N.'s Internet Sneak Attack

Populace Well-Known Member

xuzhimol Greenhorn

frednjkin Active Member

Populace Well-Known Member

Useful Searches